Benchmarks
Handwritten OCR measured against real spreadsheet work.
AxLiner is evaluated on the details that matter after upload: handwriting recognition, table structure, noisy captures, and whether the result is ready to review in Excel.
Handwriting accuracy
96.8%
on handwritten table samples
Table recovery
99.1%
rows and cell relationships
Noise tolerance
94.7%
blurred, skewed, and low-light pages
Based on 10,000+ real-world samples
Tested on IAM Handwriting Database v3.0Average across real-world handwritten and table-heavy samples.
| Metric | AxLiner | Industry Avg |
|---|---|---|
Character Error Rate Lower is better | 3.2% | 5.8% |
Word Recognition Handwriting and mixed print | 99.5% | 95.1% |
Table Structure Rows, headers, and cell boundaries | 99.1% | 92.3% |
Noisy Image Handling Phone photos and low contrast scans | 94.7% | 87.2% |
Mixed Font Recognition Printed text plus handwriting | 97.9% | 94.6% |
Processing Speed Median measured page time | 0.8s/page | 2.1s/page |
Review protocol
Scores are checked around the final workbook, not only OCR text.
Image normalization
Each stage is reviewed for spreadsheet usability: readable cells, stable rows, preserved headers, and output that can be corrected quickly.
Handwriting token pass
Each stage is reviewed for spreadsheet usability: readable cells, stable rows, preserved headers, and output that can be corrected quickly.
Table graph recovery
Each stage is reviewed for spreadsheet usability: readable cells, stable rows, preserved headers, and output that can be corrected quickly.
Spreadsheet export check
Each stage is reviewed for spreadsheet usability: readable cells, stable rows, preserved headers, and output that can be corrected quickly.
Ready to test your own batch?
Upload several pages and compare image-to-spreadsheet output directly in the review workspace.